To main content

Uncertainties in practical simulation of CO2 storage

Abstract

Practical simulation of CO2 storage in geological formations inherently involves decisions concerning relevant physics, upscaling, and numerical modeling. These decisions are unavoidable, since the full problem cannot be resolved by existing numerical approaches. Here, we report on the impact of three distinct approaches to make the problem computationally tractable: reduced physics, upscaling, and non-converged discretizations. Compounding these different strategies, we have used a benchmark study to try to assess the impact of an expert group on the results of the numerical simulations. In order to restrict the scope of the investigation, the geometric and geological description of the storage aquifer was simplified to the greatest extent possible.

The different strategies applied to simplify the problem, lead to significantly deviating answers when addressing relevant storage questions. Furthermore, there is room for interpretation when complex simulation results are simplified to the type of higher-level information sought in decision making processes. Our experience leads us to conclude that, important questions relating to CO2 storage cannot be predicted convincingly to satisfactory accuracy with numerical simulation tools, even for highly idealized problems. This emphasizes the need for real-time monitoring and history matching during injection operations.

Category

Academic article

Client

  • Research Council of Norway (RCN) / 215641

Language

English

Author(s)

  • Jan Martin Nordbotten
  • Bernd Flemisch
  • Sarah Eileen Gasda
  • Halvor Møll Nilsen
  • Yun Fan
  • Gillian E. Pickup
  • Bernd Wiese
  • Michael A. Celia
  • Helge K. Dahle
  • Geir Terje Eigestad
  • Karsten Pruess

Affiliation

  • University of Bergen
  • Princeton University
  • University of Stuttgart
  • NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS
  • SINTEF Digital / Mathematics and Cybernetics
  • Shell US
  • Heriot-Watt University
  • Helmholtz Association
  • Diverse norske bedrifter og organisasjoner
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Year

2012

Published in

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

ISSN

1750-5836

Publisher

Elsevier

Volume

9

Page(s)

234 - 242

View this publication at Cristin