To main content

UV-degradation is a key driver of the fate and impacts of marine plastics. How can laboratory experiments be designed to effectively inform risk assessment?

Abstract

Marine plastic litter is subject to different abiotic and biotic forces that lead to its degradation, the main driver being UV-induced photodegradation. Since UV-exposure leads to both physical and chemical degradation of plastic, leading to a release of micro- and nanoplastics as well as leaching of chemicals and degradation products – it is expected to have radical impacts on plastics fate and effects in the marine environment. The number of laboratory studies investigating the mechanisms of plastic UV-degradation in seawater has increased significantly in the past 10 years, but are the exposures designed in a manner that allow observations to be extrapolated to environmental fate? Most studies to date focus on quantifying plastic fragmentation and surface changes, but is this relevant for impact assessments? Here, we provide a review of the current scientific literature on UV-degradation of plastic under marine conditions. Plastic fragmentation processes and surface changes as well as implications of UV-degradation of plastics on additive leaching and the toxicity of UV-weathered versus non-weathered plastics are highlighted. Furthermore, experimental set-ups are critically inspected and recommendations for future studies are issued.

Category

Academic article

Client

  • Research Council of Norway (RCN) / 312262
  • Research Council of Norway (RCN) / 301157

Language

English

Author(s)

  • Laura M. Hernandez
  • Lucy Howarth-Forster
  • Lisbet Sørensen
  • Andy Booth
  • Alice Vidal
  • Nathalie Tufenkji
  • Richard Sempéré
  • Natascha Schmidt

Affiliation

  • McGill University
  • University of Plymouth
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology
  • SINTEF Ocean / Climate and Environment
  • Aix-Marseille University
  • NILU

Year

2025

Published in

Marine Pollution Bulletin

ISSN

0025-326X

Publisher

Elsevier

Volume

219

View this publication at Cristin