To main content

How do busy hospital circumstances affect mortality and readmission within 60 days: A cohort study of 680 000 acute admissions in Norway

Abstract

Objective To study mortality and readmissions for older patients admitted during more and less busy hospital circumstances. Design Cohort study where we identified patients that were admitted to the same hospital, during the same month and day of the week. We estimated effects of inflow of acute patients and the number of concurrent acute inpatients. Mortality and readmissions were analysed using stratified Cox-regression. Setting All people 80 years and older acutely admitted to Norwegian hospitals between 2008 and 2016. Main outcome measures Mortality and readmissions within 60 days from admission. Results Among 294 653 patients with 685 197 admissions, mean age was 86 years (standard deviation 5). Overall, 13% died within 60 days. An interquartile range difference in inflow of acute patients was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.99, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.98 to 1.00). There was little evidence of differences in readmissions, but a 7% higher risk (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.09) of being discharged outside ordinary daytime working hours. Conclusions Older patients admitted during busier circumstances had similar mortality and readmissions to those admitted during less busy periods. Yet, they showed a higher risk of discharge outside daytime working hours. Despite limited effects of busyness on a hospital level, there could still be harmful effects of local situations.
Read the publication

Category

Academic article

Language

English

Author(s)

  • Sara Marie Nilsen
  • Andreas Asheim
  • Fredrik Carlsen
  • Kjartan Sarheim Anthun
  • Lars Johan Vatten
  • Stina Aam
  • Neil Martin Davies
  • Johan Håkon Bjørngaard

Affiliation

  • SINTEF Digital / Health Research
  • University of Bristol
  • St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology
  • Nord University

Year

2022

Published in

Health Policy

ISSN

0168-8510

Volume

126

Issue

8

Page(s)

808 - 815

View this publication at Norwegian Research Information Repository