To main content

A Devil’s Advocate on SIL 4

Abstract



The concept of safety integrity levels is well established and for many safety critical systems SIL 4 is demanded by default. The problem with SIL 4 is that it is impossible to prove and the demand is often not justified. A devil’s advocate view is adopted and a number of questions related to demanding SIL 4 are asked and the problems to be addressed when answering them are discussed











Category

Academic chapter/article/Conference paper

Language

English

Author(s)

  • Odd Nordland

Affiliation

  • SINTEF Digital / Software Engineering, Safety and Security

Year

2012

Publisher

Springer

Book

Achieving Systems Safety : Proceedings of the Twentieth Safety-Critical Systems Symposium, Bristol, UK, 7-9th February 2012

ISBN

978-1-4471-2493-1

Page(s)

285 - 292

View this publication at Cristin