Publications
- Moderation of people’s subjective reactions to road noise
- Constructing noise-reaction questions for community noise surveys in nine different languages. Experiences and lessons learned
- How to Determine the Annoyance Due to the Wind Turbine
- Effect of alternate definitions of "high" annoyance on exposure-response functions
- An alternate approach to regulatory analyses of the findings of a 20-airport social survey
- Assessing community noise annoyance: A review of two decades of the international technical specification ISO/TS 15666:2003
- Recent World Health Organization regulatory recommendations are not supported by existing evidence
- On the Temporal Stability of People’s Annoyance with Road Traffic Noise
- Challenges of the use of sound emergence for setting legal noise limits Read publication
- Sample size implications for calculations of community tolerance level values from social surveys of noise-induced annoyance
Other
- Measuring Community Response to Noise—Factors Affecting the Results of Annoyance Surveys
- World Health Organization’s guidelines for environmental noise revisited
- Comparing results from annoyance surveys – Factors affecting the results of a survey
- Prediction of wind turbine noise
- Factors influencing the results of a social survey
- A method to quantify the noise annoyance in an airport community
- Issues affecting results of noise surveys around airports
- Factors moderating people's subjective reactions to road noise
- Community Tolerance Level - CTL
- Response to "Comment on 'Recent World Health Organization regulatory recommendations are not supported by existing evidence' " [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 148, 3397–3398 (2020)]