Abstract
Reliable Position, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) is becoming more and more important, considering the proliferation of highly autonomous safety- and liability-critical systems. Due to their vulnerability to various threats such as deliberate Radio Frequency Interference (RFI), including jamming, spoofing, and others, there is significant research into finding backup/fallback solutions that allow safe mission completion or termination. This work compares two such systems: one based on Angle of Arrival (AoA) measurement and one based on cellular (4G and 5G) signals. The results are generated using simulations, which are substantiated by real-world performance measurements. It is shown that both systems have the potential to serve as backup navigation solutions and that the cellular system outperforms the AoA-based solution, albeit at a much higher price and with higher computational requirements.