To main content

Size selection in sampling nets leads to underestimation of microplastic pollution

Abstract

Microplastic (MP) contamination in marine environments is a growing concern; however, the selectivity of sampling nets can introduce significant biases in MP pollution monitoring and assessments, particularly for smaller MPs, leading to an underestimation of their presence and complicating data comparability across studies. This study addresses this challenge by developing a new selectivity model that accounts for the biases in assessments. Further, it provides a robust framework for correcting MP concentration data. Size selectivity analyses were conducted to model the size-dependent retention probabilities of fibers and fragments, which are the two most common MP shapes, for nets with mesh sizes ranging from 100 to 500 μm. The results demonstrate that MP fibers and fragments exhibit distinct size selectivity patterns. Our findings reveal that larger mesh sizes significantly underestimate MP concentrations due to size-dependent retention biases. For our specific study scenario, nets with a 330 μm mesh underestimated the concentrations of MP fibers and fragments by approximately 45% and 30%, respectively, compared to a 92 μm mesh. This study is the first to systematically address the biases introduced by net mesh selectivity and provides a framework to correct for the underestimation of MP concentration due to sampling net selectivity. Thereby, it improves the accuracy of MP pollution assessments and enhancing the comparability of MP data across studies.

Category

Academic article

Language

English

Author(s)

  • Mengjie Yu
  • Bent Herrmann
  • Hui Liang
  • Manu Sistiaga
  • Zecong Zhu
  • Jure Brcic
  • Lulu Tang
  • Changdong Liu
  • Yanli Tang

Affiliation

  • SINTEF Ocean / Fisheries and New Biomarine Industry
  • University of Split
  • UiT The Arctic University of Norway
  • China
  • Ocean University of China
  • Institute of Marine Research

Year

2025

Published in

Environmental Pollution

ISSN

1566-0745

Volume

372

View this publication at Norwegian Research Information Repository