To main content

A quick and versatile one step metal-organic chemical deposition method for supported Pt and Pt-alloy catalysts

Abstract

A simple, modified Metal–Organic Chemical Deposition (MOCD) method for Pt, PtRu and PtCo nanoparticle deposition onto a variety of support materials, including C, SiC, B4C, LaB6, TiB2, TiN and a ceramic/carbon nanofiber, is described. Pt deposition using Pt(acac)2 as a precursor is shown to occur via a mixed solid/liquid/vapour precursor phase which results in a high Pt yield of 90–92% on the support material. Pt and Pt alloy nanoparticles range 1.5–6.2 nm, and are well dispersed on all support materials, in a one-step method, with a total catalyst preparation time of ∼10 hours (2.4–4× quicker than conventional methods). The MOCD preparation method includes moderate temperatures of 350 °C in a tubular furnace with an inert gas supply at 2 bar, a high pressure (2–4 bar) compared to typical MOCVD methods (∼0.02–10 mbar). Pt/C catalysts with Pt loadings of 20, 40 and 60 wt% were synthesised, physically characterised, electrochemically characterised and compared to commercial Pt/C catalysts. TEM, XRD and ex situ EXAFS show similar Pt particle sizes and Pt particle shape identifiers, namely the ratio of the third to first Pt coordination numbers modelled from ex situ EXAFS, between the MOCD prepared catalysts and commercial catalysts. Moreover, electrochemical characterisation of the Pt/C MOCD catalysts obtained ORR mass activities with a maximum of 428 A gPt−1 at 0.9 V, which has similar mass activities to the commercial catalysts (80–160% compared to the commercial Pt/C catalysts).
Read the publication

Category

Academic article

Language

English

Author(s)

  • Colleen Jackson
  • Graham T. Smith
  • Nobuhle Mpofu
  • Jack M. S. Dawson
  • Thulile Khoza
  • Caelin September
  • Susan M. Taylor
  • David W. Inwood
  • Andrew S. Leach
  • Denis Kramer
  • Andrea E. Russell
  • Anthony R. J. Kucernak
  • Pieter B. J. Levecque

Affiliation

  • SINTEF Industry / Sustainable Energy Technology
  • United Kingdom
  • Imperial College London
  • University College London
  • University of Southampton
  • CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
  • National Physical Laboratory
  • South Africa
  • University of Cape Town

Year

2020

Published in

RSC Advances

Volume

10

Issue

34

Page(s)

19982 - 19996

View this publication at Norwegian Research Information Repository