To main content

Four commentaries on the use of students and professionals in empirical software engineering experiments

Abstract

The relative pros and cons of using students or practitioners in experiments in empirical
software engineering have been discussed for a long time and continue to be an
important topic. Following the recent publication of “Empirical software engineering
experts on the use of students and professionals in experiments” by Falessi, Juristo,
Wohlin, Turhan, Münch, Jedlitschka, and Oivo (EMSE, February 2018) we received a
commentary by Sjøberg and Bergersen. Given that the topic is of great methodological
interest to the community and requires nuanced treatment, we invited two editorial board
members, Martin Shepperd and Per Runeson, respectively, to provide additional views

Category

Academic article

Client

  • Research Council of Norway (RCN) / 231679/F20
  • Research Council of Norway (RCN) / 231679

Language

English

Author(s)

  • robert Feldt
  • Thomas Zimmermann
  • Gunnar R. Bergersen
  • Davide Falessi
  • Andreas Jedlitschka
  • Natalia Juristo
  • Jürgen Münch
  • Markku Oivo
  • Per Runeson
  • Martin Shepperd
  • Dag Sjøberg
  • Burak Turhan

Affiliation

  • Chalmers University of Technology
  • Microsoft Corporation
  • University of Oslo
  • California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo,California State University
  • Germany
  • Technical University of Madrid
  • University of Oulu
  • Lund University
  • Brunel University London
  • SINTEF Digital / Software Engineering, Safety and Security
  • Monash University

Year

2018

Published in

Empirical Software Engineering

ISSN

1382-3256

Publisher

Springer

Volume

23

Issue

6

Page(s)

3801 - 3820

View this publication at Cristin