To main content

Evaluating Training for Occupational Therapists and Clinical Psychologists to Deliver Vocational Rehabilitation Within a Clinical Trial: Mixed-Methods Study

Abstract

Background Delayed return-to-work is common after serious injury. Vocational rehabilitation (VR) supports people to return to/remain in work. We developed training for occupational therapists (OTs) and clinical psychologists (CPs) to deliver a VR intervention (Return to Work After Trauma-ROWTATE) to UK trauma patients within a large-scale randomised controlled trial. Objectives Evaluate the training, OT/CP competence and confidence to deliver ROWTATE, attitudes/confidence in evidence-based practice (EBP). Methods Competency was assessed through Team Objective Structured Clinical Examination and two tasks (management plan, employer letter). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) estimated inter-rater reliability. Questionnaires measured EBP attitudes (EBPAS-36) and confidence (EPIC) pre and post-training and confidence in ROWTATE delivery post-training. Semi-structured interviews captured training experiences and confidence. Results 47 OTs and 16 CPs completed training. Competency scores were high (OT range=27.5–37.5; CP range=28.5–37; maximum=38). Inter-rater reliability was moderate (OT ICC=0.56, 95%CI 0.18,0.77; CP ICC=0.73, 95%CI −0.22,0.93). EBPAS-36 scores were high pre and post-training with no significant increase post-training. OT confidence in applying evidence (P = 0.01) and evaluating effect of their actions (P = 0.04) increased significantly post-training. OTs and CPs had high confidence (80–100% across questions) in delivering ROWTATE. Conclusions VR training resulted in high competency scores, improvements in EBP confidence and high confidence in delivering ROWTATE.
Read the publication

Category

Academic article

Language

English

Author(s)

  • Blerina Kellezi
  • Jain Holmes
  • Kate Radford
  • Roshan das Nair
  • Rebecca Lindley
  • Claire Mann
  • Isabel Andrews
  • Stephen Fallon
  • Denise Kendrick

Affiliation

  • SINTEF Digital / Health Research
  • United Kingdom
  • Nottingham Trent University
  • University of Nottingham

Date

16.03.2026

Year

2026

Published in

Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation

ISSN

1052-2263

Volume

64

Issue

3

Page(s)

261 - 274

View this publication at Norwegian Research Information Repository