CO2 storage site containment will focus on leakage issues affecting sub-sea wells and near-well area through activities concerned with well-integrity and geomechanics.

Near-well area
Derisking of CO2 storage is very important in CCS. E.g. environmental scientists have expressed concerns with the risks related to CO2 storage offshore. Thus, the purpose of the geomechanics part of our research is to maximise storage capacity with minimum risk of a significant leakage to any layer under the sea bed, as the presence of CO2 can constitute an unacceptable hazard if it leaks then to the sea.

To be able to realize the above mentioned risk mitigation, improved geomechanical models for making predictions of fracturing near the injection wells are needed. The ambition is to create simple enough models so that these can easily be implemented in the codes the industry already possesses. The Task will work on this in cooperation with Task 9, as their main focus is structural derisking of rock faults.

The Task will also investigate the development of thermal stresses in proximity to the well and injection conditions (pressure, temperature), as they can lead to tensile stresses around the well. This can in turn develop into fracturing in the cement sheath or sealing shale layers. Tensile stress near the well and their consequences on reservoir containment will therefore be closely investigated, both in the short- and long-term perspectives. Also, the effect of exposure to CO2 on creep (shale or salt) will be researched, as creep could be a healing mechanism for initial leakage close to wells.

Well integrity
Although avoiding compromise in the near-well area remains unquestionably important, the wells themselves remain the most likely pathways for potential leakage of stored CO2. This is because wells make artificial short-cut routes all the way from reservoir to topside. Avoiding well leakage will be addressed by this Task by ensuring there are multiple barriers between the storage reservoir and the surface.

Through our research on CO2 well integrity, we will develop an atlas. The atlas will contain a check list of well integrity issues compromising CO2 storage success. E.g. the atlas will include an overview of cement bonding both to rock and to metal casing to put in industry cementing software when planning new wells or evaluating legacy wells.

In addition, the industry has reacted positively to proposed research on injectivity problems, as such issues have arisen in pilots such as Snøhvit and Ketzin. A methodology of which laboratory tests to perform in order to qualify injection wells for CO2 storage will accompany this atlas.

The activities above have been chosen in accordance with the preferences of Statoil, Shell and Total as expressed in the meetings with them

Results 2017

Task 10 deals with geomechanics and well integrity, focusing on derisking the well and near well area. The wells by which CO2 is injected in a storage reservoir are identified as the largest risk for leakage from the reservoir. A laboratory activity was initiated to look at injectivity loss due to precipitation of salt near the wells. The first test resulted in massive clogging of the rock core, even though low salinity was chosen to match North Sea conditions.

A small activity also looked at developing geological fault description in geomechanical software, to help predict conditions for a leakage to occur along a fault. This activity relates to work being done in task 9 on faults. The in-house SINTEF software MDEM was used to look at injection conditions where a conductive path would be created in the weak zone alongside a fault.

Task leader