NB! The benchmark and results part of these pages have been moved to

http://www.sintef.no/projectweb/top

The old pages will soon be unavailable.

Best Known Solutions for 600-customer Benchmark Instances by Gehring and Homberger (1999)



Solutions are compared primarily on the criterion lowest number of vehicles utilised, and secondarily on shortest distance. A third criterion, waiting-time, may be considered as a further option for comparison.

Best Known Results for 600-cases
Case
Vehicles
Distance
Authors
Date
c1_6_1 60
14095,64 GH

c1_6_2 56
14163,31 PGDR
17-oct-07
c1_6_3 56
13781,19 PGDR
17-oct-07
c1_6_4 56
13571,88 MB
18-jul-05
c1_6_5 60
14085,70 BVH

c1_6_6 60
14089,56 MB
18-jul-05
c1_6_7 58
14851,65 PGDR
17-oct-07
c1_6_8 56
14541,53 PGDR
17-oct-07
c1_6_9 56
13718,23 PGDR
17-oct-07
c1_610 56
13669,88 PGDR
17-oct-07

c2_6_1
18
7774,10 MB
16-sep-03
c2_6_2 17
8380,49 PGDR
17-oct-07
c2_6_3 17
7595,43 PGDR
17-oct-07
c2_6_4 17
6993,77 RP
25-feb-05
c2_6_5 18
7575,20 BSJ2
20-sep-07
c2_6_6 18
7472,24 PGDR
17-oct-07
c2_6_7 18
7512,33 PGDR
17-oct-07
c2_6_8 17
7778,30 PGDR
17-oct-07
c2_6_9 18
7350,94 MB
16-sep-03
c2_610 17
7523,34 MB
16-sep-03

r1_6_1
59
21131,09 MB
16-sep-03
r1_6_2 54
19147,38 PGDR
17-oct-07
r1_6_3 54
17216,16 PGDR
17-oct-07
r1_6_4 54
15947,03 PGDR
17-oct-07
r1_6_5 54
20017,80 PGDR
17-oct-07
r1_6_6 54
18237,76 PGDR
17-oct-07
r1_6_7 54
16796,63 PGDR
17-oct-07
r1_6_8 54
15725,86 MB
16-sep-03
r1_6_9 54
19015,51 PGDR
17-oct-07
r1_610 54
18204,18 PGDR
17-oct-07

r2_6_1
11
18291,18 PGDR
17-oct-07
r2_6_2 11
14995,76 MB
18-jul-05
r2_6_3 11
11255,49 MB
18-jul-05
r2_6_4 11
8126,87 MB
18-jul-05
r2_6_5 11
15357,25 MB
18-jul-05
r2_6_6 11
12803,83 MB
18-jul-05
r2_6_7 11
10172,17 MB
18-jul-05
r2_6_8 11
7752,78 RP
25-feb-05
r2_6_9 11
13567,84 MB
16-sep-03
r2_610 11
12513,45 MB
18-jul-05

rc1_6_1
55
17317,13 PGDR
17-oct-07
rc1_6_2 55
16123,40 PGDR
17-oct-07
rc1_6_3 55
15358,13 PGDR
17-oct-07
rc1_6_4 55
14872,79 MB
18-jul-05
rc1_6_5 55
16934,45 PGDR
17-oct-07
rc1_6_6 55
16842,27 PGDR
17-oct-07
rc1_6_7 55
16450,42 PGDR
17-oct-07
rc1_6_8 55
16164,82 PGDR
17-oct-07
rc1_6_9 55
16153,00 MB
16-sep-03
rc1_610 55
15936,81 PGDR
17-oct-07

rc2_6_1
15
13163,03 RP
25-feb-05
rc2_6_2 12
11853,72 RP
25-feb-05
rc2_6_3 11
9816,47 MB
18-jul-05
rc2_6_4 11
7197,11 MB
18-jul-05
rc2_6_5 12
12168,79 PGDR
17-oct-07
rc2_6_6 11
12282,52 RP
25-feb-05
rc2_6_7 11
10929,56 MB
18-jul-05
rc2_6_8 11
10474,95 MB
16-sep-03
rc2_6_9 11
9821,39 MB
18-jul-05
rc2_610 11
9339,41 MB
16-sep-03








Legend:

BSJ2 - Bjørn Sigurd Johansen, BjornSigurdJohansen@hotmail.com, DSolver version2 05-2005

BVH - R. Bent and P. Van Hentenryck, "A Two-Stage Hybrid Local Search for the Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows," Technical Report CS-01-06, Department of Computer Science, Brown University, 2001.

GH - H. Gehring and J. Homberger, "A Parallel Two-phase Metaheuristic for Routing Problems with Time Windows," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 18, 35-47, (2001).

MB - Mester, D. and O. Bräysy (2005), “Active Guided Evolution Strategies for Large Scale Vehicle Routing Problems with Time Windows”. Computers & Operations Research 32, 1593-1614.

MK - M. Koch, "An approach combining two methods for the vehicle routing problem with time windows",  The solutions were presented at EURO and EURO XX Conference 2004.
PGDR - Eric Prescott-Gagnon, Guy Desaulniers and Louis-Martin Rousseau. A Branch-and-Price-Based Large Neighborhood Search Algorithm for the Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows. (2007)

RP S. Ropke & D.Pisinger. "A general heuristic for vehicle routing problems",  technical report, Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen.